|
RISKS
Seismological watch
First part of the mission
Second part of the mission
Third part of the mission
Seismological watch at Nice Airport
The Airport's Air Base Department has launched a study comprising:
- An in-depth
analysis of surveys taken over twenty years at the platform
by the Department of Town and Country Planning. This involves
synthesising the main indicators recorded over time; providing
a global evaluation of overall activity on the South embankment
in relation to theoretical forecasts;
and identifying the main hard spots.
- Subsequently
updating the current inspection programme and monitoring
the airport platform in order to optimise credits granted
by the State,
- Defining an
earthquake alert threshold (or a series of successive
thresholds) with a view to drawing up emergency procedures
at a later date, making it possible to raise the eastern
and western extremities of the South runway once and for
all.
Data collection involves five families of parameters (see plan):
- Physiographical reconnaissance (lateral
sonar),
- Monitoring reference points on dykes,
jetties, etc. (terrestrial topographical surveys) (concrete
posts on rocks forming dykes),
- Bathymetric surveys of sea bed (underwater
profile)
- Defining characteristic profiles
- Monitoring the pressure of groundwater
and aretesian water (monthly piezometer readings)

SYNTHESIS OF THE FIRST PART OF THE MISSION
The overall results reveal that the airport platform is currently
stable.
Bathymetric surveys (using
an echo sounder) and physiometric
surveys highlight minor movements that are occasionally reversible
but never significant:
- as for bathymetry in general, depth
curves hardly change between 1989 and 1994 (stability of
seabed). The only phenomena of note involve the occasional
hollowing and refilling of specific profiles.
- as for physiography, the various
granulometric facies have been examined (pebbles, gravel,
blocks of rock, etc.) without any significant movement being
brought to light.
Topographical surveys on
the surface highlight normal activity at the airport with slight
compression - lower than theoretical forecasts. The extend of
compression increases regularly towards the extremities of the
runway: 0.90m to the east and 1.20m to the west. There are also
signs of compression towards the south, but to a lesser extent.
The results on the dykes
are as follows:
- north dyke: compression increases
towards the west from 0.19m to 0.74 m; the rate of compression
is between 1 and 8mm per year towards the west
- west dyke: homogenous compression
between 1.18 and 1.30m; the rate of compression is between
6 and 8mm per year towards the south
- south west dyke: compression between
0.38 and 0.54m; the rate of compression
is between 10 and 12mm per year (to be confirmed by future
monitoring)
- western extremity of the axis of
the southern runway: greater compression towards the west.
Compression between 0.10 and 0.50 m; the rate of compression
on the edge of the runway is 10mm per year from north to
south.
- east dyke: compression decreases
from north to south. Compression of 0.55mm. The rate of
compression is between 3 and 8mm per year from north to
south
- south dyke: regular progression since
1979. Compression of 0.30 to 0.90m from west to east; rate
of compression of 2 to 7 mm in 98/99 at the eastern extremity
of the runway
- eastern extremity of the axis of
the south runway: compression from 0.10 to 0.29m from west
to east; rate of compression of 5mm per year at the eastern
extremity of the runway.
Monitoring confined and free ground water reveals their relative
stability with slight movements only, not of a nature to destabilise
the airport platform. Average levels are 0.80m for ground water
and 4.60m for artesian water.

SYNTHESIS OF THE SECOND PART OF THE MISSION
Physiographical surveys (lateral sonar). These surveys provide
a general picture of the part of the dyke that is below water,
making it possible to detect whether blocks of rock have moved.
The surveys are too imprecise for decision-making purposes and
must be complemented by visual inspections by divers. The recommended
frequency is annual. A diver undertook such a visit in October
2001. He inspected 3.5km of dyke and took 68 photos.
|
|
|
| No major disturbance noted |
just a few patches
of disturbance around underwater pipes
|
 |
 |
 |
|
and raised blocks
in the dykes.
|
Divers inspect the submerged part of the dykes. FONDASOL
recommends that divers carry out visual inspections to complete
the physical geography. These are local inspections. Dykes are
completely inspected over a period of 7 to 10 years. The opreation
is vital to complete physiographical surveys.
Bathymetric surveys Useful
at a scale of 1/2000 to highlight sizeable zones of instability.
Specific profiles at 1/200 show evolutions on a small scale,
to be complemented by an EW profile along the axis of the thalweg
located to the north-east of the airport. Recommend frequency:
annual.
Terrestrial topographical surveys
Significant reduction in the number of points monitored (from
227 to 42) because only a few are relevant. Recommended frequency:
annual.
Piezometric readings Current
arrangements must be maintained (2 ground water piezometers,
6 aretesian piezometers). Continuous monitoring with monthly
readings continue to suffice. Also, monitoring at the level
of the sea is recommended with a view to setting off an alarm
(specific study required) if a situation similar to 1979 were
to reoccur.
SYNTHESIS OF THE THIRD PART OF THE MISSION
Three alarm thresholds have been
determined in terms of acceleration of movement - weak, intermediate
and borderline. The thresholds correspond to the breakpoints
of different classes of construction. A contract was signed
in 2002 for a seismograph and emergency procedures.
|